Litman v. Goldberg — Evidence Explorer Offline

Case: Index No. 524343/2025 (NY Sup. Ct., Kings County)
Theory: Goldberg personally participated in using Litman's name on patents and the firm website after Litman's authority ceased (6/15/2020). Under Civil Rights Law § 51, LLC Law § 609, and Turane v. MGN, LLC, an LLC member is personally liable when they personally participate in the tort.

All evidence linked below is stored locally. Works offline.

Overview

Key dates: SOL cutoff 6/15/2020 • Arbitration 6/14/2023 • Post-7/21/24 (SOL-safe) • Post-6/15/2025 (late-period)

Personal participation (counsel feedback): The evidence below shows Goldberg personally signed, submitted, directed, or approved the use of Litman's name — POA forms, IFEE submissions, assignment cover sheets, website control. That is the Turane hook.

Double-click this file to explore all evidence. Everything is local — no internet required for evidence files.

Representative Clients — Major Universities

These are large institutional clients that generated substantial patent work. Litman's name was used on filings for these clients after 6/15/2020; Goldberg now continues to serve them.

ClientCountryScale / Context
King Faisal UniversitySaudi Arabia631 US patents in 2024 — more than any university in the world. 467 had Litman on Line 74; Goldberg on the remainder.
King Saud UniversitySaudi ArabiaMajor research university. 41 patents with Goldberg on Line 74 (post-6/15/2025 alone).
Kuwait UniversityKuwait10 patents with Goldberg (post-6/15/2025). Distinct from Kuwait National Petroleum Company.
United Arab Emirates UniversityUAE6 patents with Goldberg (post-6/15/2025). Assignment evidence: Litman correspondent, Goldberg submitter.
Kuwait National Petroleum CompanyKuwait3 verified patents with Litman. Major state-owned energy company.
Kuwait Institute for Scientific ResearchKuwaitIn overlap patent set.
Dasman Diabetes Institute, Sabah Al Ahmad CenterKuwaitAdditional clients from case materials.

Goldberg's Client Base Today

158 patents with Goldberg on Line 74 were issued after 6/15/2025. The Gulf universities alone account for 64+ of these (King Saud 41, Kuwait University 10, King Faisal 7, UAEU 6). These clients — originally developed with Litman's name — continue to generate significant work for Goldberg.

GOLDBERG_POST_615_2025.csv (local) — full assignee breakdown

Best Evidence Start Here

1. Same-Application Pairings — Strongest Turane Exhibits Very Strong

Goldberg signed the PTO/AIA/82A transmittal (POA) in the same application that later issued with Litman on Line 74. Ties Goldberg directly to filing activity in the very applications that publicly carried Litman's name.

ApplicationPatentGoldberg-signed 82ALine 74
18/242,46512,043,608 B1 (July 23, 2024)Sept. 5, 2023 — Reg. No. 44126Nath, Goldberg & Meyer; Richard C. Litman
18/511,80012,116,333 B1 (Oct. 15, 2024)Nov. 16, 2023 — Reg. No. 44126Nath, Goldberg & Meyer; Richard C. Litman

POA PDFsPatent front pagesLine 74 annotated

2. Assignment Cover Sheets

Goldberg as submitter per Assignment Center. Screenshots captured — 13 with assignment data, 2 not found. See Assignment Documents.

ApplicationPatentDateSubmitter
18/392,66311,980,93712/21/2023JOSHUA B. GOLDBERG
18/383,44811,952,37110/29/2023JOSHUA B. GOLDBERG
18/118,551 (UAEU)11,814,30903/07/2023JOSHUA B. GOLDBERG

Download guide

3. 12 Post-7/21/24 Overlap Patents (BOP Exhibit A)

Patents issued after July 21, 2024 where Litman and Goldberg both appear. All 12 PDFs stored locally.

Exhibit A: 12 front pagesLine 74 highlightedExhibit list

View table and local PDFs below →

4. Website — June 21, July 8, Sept 5, 2025

June 21 and July 8 show "PATENT ATTORNEY" (no "Retired"). Removed from professionals page by Sept 5, 2025. Screenshots below (local)

5. 905 Patents Since 6/15/2020 — Visual Chart

One-page patent count chart — monthly bars, 2024 spike highlighted. Customer Number memoClusters by issue date (local)

6. Four Exemplar Patents

IFEE PDFs: 11,881,807, 11,932,607, 11,976,365, 11,980,937 (local)

Power of Attorney: evidence/poa/ — All POA PDFs downloaded from USPTO. Extraction guide — who is listed, who signed.

7. KNPC — Three Verified Patents

12,157,086; 12,280,479; 12,510,313 — ANALYSIS_knpc_patents.csv (local)

Goldberg's Signature on Filings Very Strong Evidence

Strongest: Same-application pairings (18/242,465, 18/511,800) — Goldberg signed 82A in the same app that issued with Litman on Line 74. See Best Evidence.

POA: Goldberg signed 82A transmittals. Assignments: Goldberg as submitter per Assignment Center — screenshots in evidence/assignments/. IFEE: Goldberg's name in OCR; package does not establish submitter without filing image.

Document typeCountSignatoryPatents
POA (82A) — same-app pairings2Joshua B. Goldberg18/242,465→12,043,608; 18/511,800→12,116,333
POA (other)4Joshua B. Goldberg11,881,807; 11,932,607; 11,976,365; 11,980,937
Assignment cover sheets15JOSHUA B. GOLDBERG (screenshots)Priority + BOP; 13 captured, 2 not found

POA extraction (CSV)POA PDFs (local)Assignment Center links

Line 74 Control Inference

Key legal inference: If Goldberg's name appears on Line 74 of a patent, he had control over whose name was designated as attorney. That same control would have applied when Litman's name was used — supporting the argument that Goldberg directed or permitted that use.

Why it matters: Control over his own name on Line 74 implies control over Litman's name; strengthens willfulness.

Reports:

Assignment Documents

Applications assigned through filing by Goldberg in 2023/24. When issued, patent has Litman on Line 74 — Goldberg trading off Litman's name.

Priority (Goldberg as submitter) — screenshots:

  • 18/392,663 — KFU, Docket 33150.15U, Patent 11,980,937
  • 18/383,448 — KFU, Docket 33135.22U, Patent 11,952,371
  • 18/118,551 — UAEU, Docket 33090.24U, Patent 11,814,309

BOP exhibits (13 captured, 2 not found): 18242465183799061824139418414442 (not found)18428327184132391842592318411323297466711824104918511800 (not found)18612504

ManifestGuide

Court-Ready Evidence Package New

Three outputs for court-ready evidence (per counsel feedback):

OutputFile
Master patent list (chronological)MASTER_PATENT_LIST_CHRONOLOGICAL.csv
SOL exhibit list (post-7/21/24)SOL_EXHIBIT_LIST_POST_7_21_2024.csv
Exhibit A — Front pagesEXHIBIT_A_FRONT_PAGES.pdf
Exhibit A — Line 74 highlightedEXHIBIT_A_FRONT_PAGES_LINE74_ANNOTATED.pdf

Supporting: KFU/KSU accounting summaryAssignee verification memo

12 Post-7/21/24 Overlap Patents — Local PDFs

BOP Exhibit A. Exhibit order matches Exhibit A front pages. All PDFs in evidence/patents/.

ExhPatentDateAssigneeLocal PDF
112,043,6082024-07-23King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
212,043,6092024-07-23King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
312,049,4592024-07-30King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
412,054,4602024-08-06King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
512,054,4642024-08-06King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
612,062,7802024-08-13King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
712,065,4242024-08-20King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
812,071,4372024-08-27King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
9D1,046,1412024-10-08(look up)Open PDF
1012,114,6202024-10-15(look up)Open PDF
1112,116,3332024-10-15King Faisal UniversityOpen PDF
1212,194,4342025-01-14(verify KSU)Open PDF

SOL exhibit list (CSV)Legacy table

Website Evidence

Timeline: "PATENT ATTORNEY" through July 8 → Removed by Sept 5

Report: Website Change Evidence & Who Made the Changes

DateCaptureWhat it shows
Jan 15, 2023ScreenshotDepartment attribution (Mechanical vs Commercialization)
June 21, 2025ScreenshotLitman as "PATENT ATTORNEY" — no "Retired"
July 8, 2025ScreenshotStill "PATENT ATTORNEY" (no Retired)
Sept 5, 2025ScreenshotLitman removed from professionals page

June 21, 2025 — Richard Litman Profile (Wayback, header visible)

Wayback June 21 2025

Capture guide

Court Filings Index No. 524343/2025

December 5, 2025 — Hon. Aaron D. Maslow, J.S.C.

Doc #60 — Motion to Dismiss: GRANTED as to Counts I-IV; DENIED as to Count V (misappropriation — NY Civil Rights Law §§ 50-51).

Doc #61 — Cross-Motion: GRANTED solely to extent misappropriation claim remains.

Key finding: Goldberg does NOT deny the patent facts. His Affirmation (Doc #19) does not mention patents, Line 74, or USPTO at all. Patent facts are admitted in Goldberg's pleading.

Needed: Court reporter transcript of 12/05/2025 oral ruling.

Complaint Paragraph Cross-Reference (Patents)

Paragraphs mentioning patents: ¶3, ¶32, ¶33, ¶34, ¶35, ¶37, ¶38, ¶72, ¶74

ParaContent
¶33"Defendant Goldberg caused Plaintiff to be listed as attorney of record on hundreds of U.S. patents issued between 2020 and January 2025"
¶38Nunc Pro Tunc Assignment (Reel 007281, Frame 0821) — Goldberg's own recorded statement re: Litman's name ownership
¶72Count V: "used Plaintiff's name, identity, and reputation in commerce without consent, including by listing him as attorney of record on hundreds of U.S. patents"

Documents & Reports

New Reports (Counsel)

Reports created for court-ready package and website change evidence:

Counsel Feedback — Addressed

2026-03-17 Feedback: "How Goldberg did it is key to liability — include assignments and filing receipts, office actions and other documents with mailing address including my name."

The Prosecution Document Chain (How He Did It)

Every patent application produces a chain of official USPTO documents, each bearing the attorney of record's name. Goldberg's POA filing caused Litman's name to appear at every stage:

StageDocumentDirectionShowsFile
Power of Attorney (82A)Goldberg → USPTOGoldberg names Litman as attorney, designates CN-37833evidence/poa_pdfs/
Filing ReceiptUSPTO → NGM/Litman"Attorney: Richard C. Litman" — sent to CN-37833evidence/mechanism_docs/">evidence/mechanism_docs/
Office Actions (CTNF/CTFR)USPTO → NGM/LitmanRejections sent to Litman at NGM — NGM responds as his firmevidence/mechanism_docs/">evidence/mechanism_docs/
Notice of Allowance (PTOL-85)USPTO → NGM/LitmanLine 74 pre-set: "Richard C. Litman" — sent to CN-37833evidence/mechanism_docs/">evidence/mechanism_docs/
Issue Fee (PTOL-85B)Lafave → USPTOLafave types "Richard C. Litman" in Box 2evidence/ifw_ifee/
Issued Patent (Line 74)Public record"Nath, Goldberg & Meyer; Richard C. Litman"evidence/patents/

Assignments — Second Channel: Goldberg also signed assignment cover sheets listing "RICHARD C. LITMAN / Nath, Goldberg & Meyer" as correspondent (Apps 18/392,663 and 18/383,448 — both post-arbitration).

Full Mechanism MemoSettlement Presentation (updated)Internal Counsel Package (updated)

All 116 Filing Receipts, Office Actions, and NOAs have been downloaded to evidence/mechanism_docs/

Earlier Feedback (RFP & BOP): RFP_AND_BOP_FEEDBACK_MEMO.md

  • Personal participation theory — Goldberg's personal signing, submitting, directing, approving (§ 51, LLC Law § 609, Turane)
  • Same-application pairings — 18/242,465 and 18/511,800: strongest Turane exhibits
  • Assignment cover sheets — Screenshots in evidence/assignments/; Goldberg as submitter

RFP Compliance ChecklistPersonal Participation InsertsCase Paint by Numbers

Source Documents

  • Plaintiff's BOP (2025) — not available on website
  • Between 6/15/20 and 6/15/25 — not available on website

Litman v. Goldberg — Evidence Explorer (Offline). Double-click to open. Assignment Center links require internet; all other evidence is local.