← litmanintelligence.com  |  ← Counsel PDFs index  |  Counsel dashboard

Royalty Free License And Bp Analysis

ROYALTY-FREE LICENSE AND B&P AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS

Date: April 15, 2026

Source Documents

  1. Royalty-Free License (Sept. 29, 2012) -- Richard C. Litman (Licensor) to Litman Law Offices, Ltd. (Licensee)
  2. 2012 Becker & Poliakoff Agreements (Sept. 28 - Oct. 1, 2012) -- Complete package of 11 agreements

PART I: THE ROYALTY-FREE LICENSE

Parties

What Exactly Is Licensed

The license covers Litman's "intellectual property and other intangible assets" ("IA"), including but not limited to "trademarks and service marks ('Marks') used worldwide in connection with legal and related services," as described in Exhibit A (the same Schedule A / Exhibit A that appears in the Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement).

The IA is defined expansively to include: - Trademarks, trade names, service marks, slogans, logos ("Marks") - Domain names, URLs, websites, email addresses, telephone numbers - Client lists, databases, SalesForce records, Practice Master software - Copyrights, trade secrets, know-how, processes, procedures - Bank accounts (including Freedom Bank 220001002, 220001028, 220001010, 220001036, 220001185) - USPTO Customer Numbers 24396 and 37833 - All records on servers, electronic files, storage systems

Specific Marks listed: - THE GLOBAL ACADEMIC INNOVATION LAW FIRM - LIGHT BULB ROBOT MASCOT DESIGN - LIGHT BULB OVER POLYGON Design - "various authorized uses of LITMAN and LITMAN LAW and Marks owned personally by Litman" - GREAT IDEAS DESERVE GREAT SERVICE, GREAT IDEAS, WIN WASHINGTON INVENTORS NETWORK, PAT N. PENDING, AMERICAN LEGAL SERVICES, ARABIC INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ACADEMIC INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 24-HOUR LAW LINE, GAIN LEGAL, GAIN ORGANIZATION, AIM, SOROOF LITMAN USA IP SERVICES, PATENT LITIGATION SEARCH, PATENT ILLUSTRATORS, GREAT IDEAS MEDIA, FIRST CLASS MANAGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INSTITUTE, INDEPENDENT INVENTORS INTERNATIONAL

Marks ALREADY owned by Litman personally (acknowledged, not transferred): - 4PATENTS (Reg. No. 2468564) - 4PATENT (Reg. No. 2448710) - LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD. (Reg. No. 1861297) - AMERICAN PATENT SERVICES (Reg. No. 1915596) - 1-800-4-PATENT (Reg. No. 1918491) - AMERICAN MARKETING AND ADVERTISING - AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ADVERTISING AND MARKETING - BENSWOOD - LITMAN LAW - LITMAN - RICHARD LITMAN

Domain names owned by Litman personally: - 4patent.com, 4patent.biz, 4patent.info, 4patent.mobi, 4patent.net, 4patent.org, 4patent.us - 4-patent.com, 4-patents.com, 4invention.com, 4inventor.com, 4patentsearch.com - litman-ip.com, litman-law.biz, litmanip.com, litmanlaw.biz, litmanlaw.com, litmanlaw.info, litmanlaw.net, litmanlaw.org, litmanlaw.us, litmanlawoffices.com - americanpatent.biz/.com/.info/.net/.org/.us, americanpatentservice.net, americanpatentservices.biz/.com/.info/.net/.org/.us - forpatent.com/.net/.org, forpatents.com, fourpatent.com - gain-online.org, gain-wiki.com, gain-wiki.org - patent.sa.com, patentreferenceguide.com, patents.sa.com - richard.litman.name, richardlitman.com - aim.sa.com

Email addresses as Purchase Assets (i.e., Litman personally owns): - litman@4patent.com (and other 4patent.com email addresses) - rlitman@litmanlaw.com (and other litmanlaw.com email addresses) - admin@gain-online.org (and other gain.com email addresses)

Scope of the License (Section 1)

Section 1.1 -- Scope: Litman grants LLO a royalty-free, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the IA "in connection with its services while Licensor is Manager of Licensee, pursuant to a separate agreement." Licensee shall make no other use of the IA.

CRITICAL NOTE: The first copy of the Royalty-Free License (pages 1-3 of the first PDF, notarized by "Jenny Jamogle" on 9-28-2012) says "non-exclusive, non-transferable." The second copy (pages 32-34 of the B&P agreements PDF) says "exclusive, non-transferable." Both are dated September 29, 2012. The B&P Offer Letter (page 3) also refers to "a royalty free license agreement" without specifying exclusivity. The Management Agreement Section 5 references the license as "a royalty free license to use the IA subject to the quality control requirements of Manager." The existence of two versions with different exclusivity language is itself significant -- it suggests the terms were negotiated and the final version may differ from what was notarized.

Section 1.2 -- Non-Assignment: The rights granted are license rights only -- "nothing contained in this Agreement constitutes or shall be construed to be an assignment of any or all of Licensor's rights in the IA."

Licensor's Control and Ownership (Section 2)

Section 2.1 -- Quality Control: Before first use of the IA, Licensee must obtain Licensor's approval of ALL aspects of such use. Once initially approved, any subsequent alteration, modification, or change must be reviewed and approved by Licensor PRIOR to implementation.

Section 2.2 -- Ownership of Changes: Licensor (Litman) will own any alteration, modification or change made to the IA. Licensee must cooperate in establishing Licensor's ownership, including executing assignments.

Use of the IA (Section 3)

Section 3.1 -- Trademark Format: Licensor retains the right to specify the FORMAT in which Licensee uses and displays the Marks and IA. Licensee may only use the IA in a format approved by Licensor.

Section 3.3 -- Impairment of Rights: Licensee shall not "at any time, whether during or after the term of this Agreement, do or cause to be done any act or thing challenging, contesting, impairing, invalidating, or tending to impair or invalidate any of Licensor's rights in the IA."

Section 3.4 -- Maintenance: At Licensee's expense, Licensee will maintain federal registrations, domain name ownership, and other IA maintenance.

Termination (Section 4)

Section 4.1 -- By Notice: Either party may terminate with 60 days' written notice.

Section 4.2 -- Automatic Termination for Cause: Licensee's rights automatically terminate WITHOUT notice if: - (i) Licensee attempts to assign, sub-license, transfer or convey any licensed rights without written consent - (ii) Licensee fails to obtain Licensor's approval under Section 2 - (iii) Licensee uses the IA in violation of Section 3 restrictions - (iv) Licensee uses the IA in a manner not expressly permitted - (v) Licensor is no longer Manager of Licensee

Section 4.3 -- Effect of Termination: ALL rights expire upon termination. Licensee shall IMMEDIATELY cease and desist from all further use of the IA.

Miscellaneous (Section 5)

Signatures

Both copies signed by Richard C. Litman personally AND as President of LLO. The first copy also notarized by "Jenny Jamogle" dated 9-28-2012.


PART II: THE B&P AGREEMENTS PACKAGE

The PDF contains 11 documents executed September 28 - October 1, 2012:

1. B&P Offer Letter (Oct. 1, 2012)

2. Acknowledgement of Assignment re: LLO (Oct. 1, 2012)

3. Articles of Merger Including a Stock Exchange (filed with VA SCC)

4. Assets Purchase Agreement -- RCL to B&P (Sept. 30, 2012)

5. Assets Purchase Agreement -- Patent Law Building, LLC to B&P (Sept. 30, 2012)

6. Management Agreement (Sept. 28, 2012)

7. Amendment to Management Agreement (Sept. 30, 2012)

8. Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement -- LLO to RCL (Sept. 28, 2012)

9. Royalty-Free License (Sept. 29, 2012)

10. Tax-Free Stock Exchange Agreement

11. Shareholder Agreement (Oct. 1, 2012)


A. THE LICENSE DOES NOT AUTHORIZE USE OF LITMAN'S PERSONAL NAME ON PATENT FILINGS

The Royalty-Free License covers "Marks" and "IA" as defined in Exhibit A / Schedule A. While the Marks include "various authorized uses of LITMAN and LITMAN LAW," the license is:

  1. Conditioned on Litman being Manager of Licensee (Section 1.1: "while Licensor is Manager of Licensee")
  2. Subject to quality control (Section 2.1: prior approval required for all uses and any changes)
  3. Limited to use "in connection with its services" (Section 1.1)
  4. Non-transferable (Section 1.2) and non-assignable (Section 5.1)

The license was granted to LLO (Litman Law Offices, Ltd.), not to B&P, not to NGM, and not to Joshua Goldberg. It cannot be assigned or transferred without Litman's written consent.

The license says NOTHING about: - Signing Litman's name on Powers of Attorney - Filing documents with the USPTO under Litman's registration number - Listing Litman as attorney of record on patent filings - Putting Litman's name on patent front pages (Line 74) - Representing to clients that Litman is actively practicing - Using Litman's name on the nathlaw.com website

B. AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OCCURRED NO LATER THAN THE 2017 COMBINATION

Under Section 4.2(v), the license automatically terminates without notice when "Licensor is no longer Manager of Licensee." The Management Agreement had a term through June 30, 2015. When B&P dissolved and the practice transitioned to NGM (Nath, Goldberg & Meyer) via the March 29, 2017 Combination Agreement, the LLO entity and the Manager relationship fundamentally changed.

Even if the Management Agreement was somehow extended or the Manager role continued through the Combination, the 2017 Combination Agreement and May 2017 Amendment created a new entity (NGM) that is NOT the Licensee under this agreement. The license was granted to LLO, and LLO cannot assign or sublicense it. NGM is not a party to the Royalty-Free License.

C. THE INTANGIBLE ASSETS PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS THE FOUNDATION

The Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement (Sept. 28, 2012) is the dispositive document that establishes Litman's personal ownership of ALL intangible property:

"The Purchase Assets and the asset already owned by Litman constitute the entire intangible property of LLO, which by this Agreement is sold, assigned and conveyed to Litman personally."

This means: - Before the stock exchange, LLO transferred all its intangibles to Litman personally - After the stock exchange, B&P got a shell corporation (LLO) with no intangible assets - The only way B&P/LLO could use the intangibles was through the Royalty-Free License - When the license terminated, all rights reverted to Litman

D. PERSONAL NAME MARKS EXPRESSLY RETAINED BY LITMAN

The Schedule A / Exhibit A explicitly lists marks "already owned by Litman" that include: - LITMAN - LITMAN LAW - RICHARD LITMAN - LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD. (Reg. No. 1861297)

These were NEVER transferred to LLO or anyone else. They were "acknowledged as already being owned by Litman." The $200,000 Assets Purchase Agreement sold only the SERVICE MARK registration for LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD. -- not the personal name marks LITMAN and RICHARD LITMAN.

E. EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE LITMAN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY

The Schedule A explicitly lists as Purchase Assets owned by Litman: - litman@4patent.com (and other 4patent.com email addresses) - rlitman@litmanlaw.com (and other litmanlaw.com email addresses)

This makes the July 18, 2025 email elimination (Finding #23) not just a breach of Amendment Section 3 (as already established), but also a deprivation of Litman's personal property as established by the 2012 Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement. Goldberg eliminated email accounts that belong to Litman personally -- accounts that were never LLO's or B&P's or NGM's to eliminate.

F. DOMAIN NAMES ARE LITMAN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY

The Schedule A lists 50+ domain names as owned by Litman personally, including: - All 4patent.com variants - All litmanlaw.com variants - richardlitman.com, richard.litman.name

This confirms Finding #43 (4patent.com domain control): NGM's control of 4patent.com infrastructure, routing through nathlaw.onmicrosoft.com, constitutes use of Litman's personal property without authorization.

G. FREEDOM BANK ACCOUNTS WERE PURCHASE ASSETS

The Schedule A lists Freedom Bank accounts 220001002, 220001028, 220001010, 220001036, and 220001185 as intangible assets transferred to Litman personally. The Management Agreement confirms Litman was "the largest shareholder, Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors" of Freedom Bank.

This massively strengthens Finding #99 (Freedom Bank spoliation): The accounts that Goldberg closed on July 28, 2025 were accounts that originated as LLO Purchase Assets -- assets that were sold to Litman personally and then licensed back to LLO. When the license terminated and the practice transitioned to NGM, NGM had no right to these accounts, yet continued to use them (Finding #102: $129,680 KSU wire routed through Freedom Bank in May 2024) and then destroyed them post-litigation.

H. USPTO CUSTOMER NUMBERS ARE LITMAN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY

The Schedule A explicitly lists "USPTO Customer Numbers 24396 and 37833" as Purchase Assets. These are the exact customer numbers at issue in the case: - CN-37833 = patent correspondence routing (Finding #107: Goldberg removed Litman's name from CN-37833 on May 1, 2025) - CN-24396 = Nicola Pizza trademark correspondence routing (Finding #72)

Goldberg's unilateral modification of CN-37833 (removing Litman's name, moving himself to primary email position) constitutes unauthorized alteration of Litman's personal property.

I. CONNECTION TO THE 2017 COMBINATION AGREEMENT

The 2012 agreements establish the complete ownership chain:

  1. Sept. 28, 2012: LLO sells ALL intangible assets to Litman personally ($2,000) -- Bill of Sale executed
  2. Sept. 29, 2012: Litman licenses the IA back to LLO via Royalty-Free License (conditioned on Manager role)
  3. Sept. 30, 2012: Litman sells LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD. service mark to B&P ($200,000)
  4. Oct. 1, 2012: Stock exchange -- Litman exchanges LLO shares for B&P shares; LLO becomes B&P subsidiary

Then in 2017: 5. March 29, 2017: Combination Agreement between LLO/B&P and Nath & Associates 6. May 6, 2017: Amendment to Combination Agreement -- transfers 5 specific service marks and expressly carves out Litman's "name, signature, voice, image, photograph or likeness" (Exhibit R)

The 2017 Amendment (Exhibit R / Finding #86) is consistent with and reinforces the 2012 framework: Litman's personal name was NEVER part of any asset transfer. The Combination Agreement transferred specific service marks (including LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD.), but the Amendment's carve-out provision explicitly excluded personal name rights -- exactly as the 2012 Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement had structured it.

Goldberg's Affirmative Defense #10 (consent) fails because:

  1. The Royalty-Free License was granted to LLO, not NGM. NGM is not a party and cannot claim rights under it.
  2. The license automatically terminated when Litman ceased being Manager of LLO (Section 4.2(v)).
  3. The license was non-transferable (Section 1.2) and non-assignable (Section 5.1).
  4. The license required quality control approval for all uses (Section 2.1), which Goldberg never sought.
  5. The license covered Marks and IA, NOT personal name on patent filings. There is no provision authorizing anyone to sign Litman's name on USPTO documents.
  6. The 2017 Amendment explicitly carved out personal name, signature, voice, image, photograph, and likeness.
  7. Litman's personal name marks (LITMAN, RICHARD LITMAN) were acknowledged as personally owned and never transferred to anyone.

K. THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT CONFIRMS LITMAN'S ROLE AS CONTROLLING PARTY

The Management Agreement makes clear that the royalty-free license was conditional on: - Payment of Freedom Bank Debt - Payment of $5,720/month Compensation - Maintenance of ERE coverage - Maintenance of professional liability insurance - Litman's continuing role as Manager

If any of these conditions failed, the license terminated. By the time of the NGM transition, multiple conditions had likely failed.


PART IV: NEW FINDINGS FROM THESE DOCUMENTS

Finding #117: FIVE FREEDOM BANK ACCOUNTS -- NOT TWO

The Schedule A lists FIVE Freedom Bank account numbers: 220001002, 220001028, 220001010, 220001036, and 220001185. Previously only two accounts (220001002 and 220001028) were confirmed from the May 2017 Amendment. Three additional accounts (220001010, 220001036, 220001185) are now identified as original LLO Purchase Assets transferred to Litman personally. These may still hold client funds or may have been closed without disclosure.

Finding #118: LITMAN'S SALARY WAS $550,000/YEAR + $5,720/MONTH ($68,640/YEAR) = $618,640 TOTAL

The B&P employment was $550,000/year as Class B Shareholder, plus $5,720/month ($68,640/year) as Managing Attorney of the LLO subsidiary. Total compensation: $618,640/year, plus bonuses. This establishes the baseline for what Litman's professional identity was worth.

Finding #119: LITMAN PERSONALLY OWNS ALL EMAIL ADDRESSES AND DOMAIN NAMES

The 2012 Intangible Assets Purchase Agreement and Bill of Sale establish Litman's personal ownership of litman@4patent.com, all @4patent.com addresses, all @litmanlaw.com addresses, and 50+ domain names. This transforms the email elimination (Finding #23), the 4patent.com DKIM routing (Finding #43), and the 91-alias infrastructure (Finding #110) from contractual breaches into property deprivation.

Finding #120: ROYALTY-FREE LICENSE HAS EXCLUSIVITY DISCREPANCY

Two versions of the Royalty-Free License exist in the record. The standalone notarized copy (notarized 9/28/2012) says "non-exclusive, non-transferable." The copy in the B&P agreements package says "exclusive, non-transferable." The difference is legally significant: an exclusive license would give LLO the sole right to use the IA, while a non-exclusive license would allow Litman to license the IA to others simultaneously. Both versions agree the license is non-transferable and conditioned on the Manager role.

Finding #121: B&P EXPRESSLY ASSUMED FREEDOM BANK DEBT AND INDEMNIFIED LITMAN

Multiple agreements (Tax-Free Stock Exchange Section 7.2, Shareholder Agreement Section 4(b), Management Agreement Section 3) obligate B&P to pay the Freedom Bank Debt and indemnify Litman. B&P "unconditionally and irrevocably agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Bank" and "expressly waives (i) any defense or claim of discharge based on any setoff, counterclaim, recoupment or similar legal or equitable right." This indemnification obligation transferred to NGM via the 2017 Combination. Whether Goldberg honored it is a discovery target.


PART V: EVIDENTIARY SIGNIFICANCE FOR COUNT V (NY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW SS 50-51)

These documents establish a dispositive chain of title for Litman's name and professional identity:

  1. Litman personally owns the marks LITMAN, RICHARD LITMAN, LITMAN LAW, and all associated email addresses, domain names, and USPTO Customer Numbers.
  2. The Royalty-Free License was the ONLY mechanism by which LLO could use these assets -- and it was conditional, non-transferable, and subject to automatic termination.
  3. NGM was never a party to the Royalty-Free License and cannot claim rights under it.
  4. The 2017 Amendment (Exhibit R) explicitly carved out Litman's personal name, confirming that name rights were never part of any asset sale.
  5. Every use of Litman's name by NGM/Goldberg after the license terminated is unauthorized use of Litman's personal property.

These are the foundational documents that the entire case rests upon. Combined with Exhibit R (the 2017 contractual carve-out) and the Nunc Pro Tunc Assignment (Goldberg's recorded acknowledgment that Litman owns his name), they create an airtight ownership chain that Goldberg cannot overcome with any consent-based defense.