← litmanintelligence.com  |  ← Counsel PDFs index  |  Counsel dashboard

Meyer Emails Analysis Part1

Meyer Emails Analysis (Part 1: Pages 1-100 + Full Document Survey)

Source: 0008- Meyer Emails (RL_6032-6814).pdf — 783 pages, Bates RL_6032 through RL_6814 Date Range: Approximately August 2020 through March 2023 Production Context: Arbitration discovery — emails from/to/cc Jerald L. Meyer


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This 783-page document is overwhelmingly operational — client payment processing, docketing procedures, office administration, and routine correspondence. It does NOT contain the March 2021 "CASE Act" email thread with Meyer's bombshell admissions about the "multi-million dollar receivable," "5-year tail," and trust account promises (those are already in evidence as Exhibit L from the federal case filing).

However, the document is extremely valuable as cumulative evidence for several reasons documented below.


KEY FINDINGS

Finding 1: MEYER AS CO-MANAGING PARTNER — FULL OPERATIONAL CONTROL

Bates: Throughout (RL_6039, RL_6057, RL_6094, RL_6099, RL_6101, RL_6102, RL_6349, RL_6362, RL_6374, RL_6376, RL_6379, RL_6782, RL_6783)

Meyer signs every email as "Jerald Meyer / Co-Managing Partner" and exercises direct management authority over: - Docketing Department supervision (took over from Scott in April 2022 — RL_6039) - Office space decisions ("Josh and I have been considering" — RL_6099) - Building sale investigation ("Josh and I (and Gary) are investigating selling the building" — RL_6099) - Parking policy (RL_6101, RL_6102) - Holiday bonuses ("Josh and I have authorized Jen to provide everyone with a holiday bonus" — RL_6057) - New employee announcements (Nadera Moustafa — RL_6094) - File shredding — "31,000 pounds of paper" destroyed (RL_6783) - Alarm protocols (RL_6782)

Why it matters: Destroys any defense that Meyer was merely a passive partner or unaware of firm operations. He is actively co-managing every aspect of the firm while Litman's name remains on all patents and correspondence.

Finding 2: RICHARD LITMAN SYSTEMATICALLY CC'd ON ALL CLIENT CORRESPONDENCE

Bates: RL_6036, RL_6042, RL_6044, RL_6046, RL_6059-RL_6092 (KSU thread), RL_6104, RL_6349-RL_6352 (KSU payment thread), RL_6398-RL_6400

Every single KSU email chain CC's rlitman@nathlaw.com. Every KSU email chain also CC's ksu@4patent.com (the Litman-domain alias). Litman is on the CC line of all substantive client communications throughout 2022-2023, including: - KSU $1,437,568 wire transfer thread (RL_6059-RL_6070) - KSU payment follow-ups from Oct 2022 through Feb 2023 (RL_6070-RL_6092) - KSU "Next Steps" payment collection thread (RL_6349-RL_6352) - KSU "Regular Meeting" scheduling (RL_6398) - New KSU patent applications (RL_6036) - Conflict checks (RL_6229)

Why it matters: NGM treated Litman as a current member of the firm for ALL client communication purposes throughout 2022-2023. This is direct evidence of ongoing commercial use of his name and identity. His presence on every client email thread is inconsistent with any claim that he was retired or uninvolved.

Finding 3: "RCL ORIGINATION CREDIT" — SYSTEMATIC ATTRIBUTION

Bates: RL_6049 (Feb 8, 2023), RL_6111 (Feb 23, 2023)

Martha Long explicitly notes "RCL origination credit" when opening new client matters: - RL_6049 (Feb 8, 2023): "RCL origination credit" for Dr. Hadi Alqahtani (KSU professor) — new patent search, Client 200641 - RL_6111 (Feb 23, 2023): "RCL Origination Credit" for Dr. Abdulmohsen Al-Terki — new client transferred from Sabah Center, Client 200647

Why it matters: These are post-arbitration-filing (arbitration filed pre-June 2023) origination credits. NGM's own internal system attributes new client acquisition to "RCL" (Richard C. Litman) even as they dispute his ongoing relationship with the firm. Corroborates Finding #61 (98% of all NGM matters list Litman as referral source).

Finding 4: LITMAN ACTIVELY MANAGING CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS POST-"TERMINATION"

Bates: RL_6059-RL_6062 (Jan 21-24, 2023)

Richard Litman emails Goldberg on Jan 22, 2023 with detailed client management strategy: - Omar Albannai: "he would like a page or two on pursuing patents and increasing rankings" - Sheikha (Oman): "she also has started an IP consultancy in Oman and emailed me last week. I offered a Zoom meeting." - KSU/KFU strategy: "Client relationship management is high priority right now. Two Saudi relationships to discuss: KFU and KSU." - KSU trust account management: Litman proposes "shifting money between specific subsidiary KSU trust accounts" — demonstrating detailed knowledge of trust balances - Great Ideas Radio concept: Litman proposes podcast/interview series to replace in-person client visits

Litman characterizes his discussions with Goldberg as "settlement discussions" (RL_6059, Jan 24, 2023): "Teams is okay, provided it is not recorded and off the record. These are settlement discussions."

On Feb 9, 2023, Litman writes directly to KSU's Dr. Thamer Albahkali (RL_6062): "Thanks to both of you for closing the book on past challenges, and getting the relationship back on track."

Why it matters: This is 2.5+ years after the June 15, 2020 "termination" and 7 months before the arbitration award. Litman is actively managing KSU client relationships, proposing trust account strategies, and maintaining direct contact with GCC clients. Completely destroys the "disability = death" defense and proves ongoing commercial exploitation of Litman's client relationships.

Finding 5: THE 20% FEE STRUCTURE CONFIRMED IN OPERATION

Bates: RL_6135 (Jan 25, 2023)

Martha Long to Valencia Gray (accounting): "I have taken the 20% off of the total for the attorney's fees paid."

Context: Breakdown of a $143,796.29 KFU wire transfer. Martha is applying the 20% KFU fee discount to calculate trust allocations.

Why it matters: While this is the KFU client fee discount (not the Litman 20% compensation formula directly), it shows that 20% calculations were routine in NGM's accounting. Combined with the Payment Allocation Report time series (Finding #66), this confirms 20% was an operational baseline at the firm.

Finding 6: MASSIVE KFU/KSU PAYMENT VOLUME DOCUMENTED

Bates: RL_6032-RL_6034 (KSU $16,030), RL_6048-RL_6049 ($735 new search), RL_6069 (KSU $1,437,568 wire), RL_6091 (KSU 5 wires), RL_6106 (Kuwait Univ $2,009), RL_6118 (Kuwait Univ $3,470), RL_6126-RL_6127 (KFU $42,804.19), RL_6133 (KFU $90,997.52), RL_6135 (KFU $143,796.29), RL_6139 (KFU $331,322)

Documented wire transfers in this production alone total well over $2 million: - KSU $1,437,568.00 (Dec 22, 2022) — the Exhibit J wire - KFU $331,322.00 (Mar 8, 2023) - KFU $143,796.29 (Jan 17, 2023) - KFU $90,997.52 (Jan 30, 2023) - KFU $42,804.19 (Feb 6, 2023) - KSU $16,030.00 (Feb 17, 2023) - KSU 5 wires (Sept 21, 2022) — ~$609,170 per Thamer's email - Kuwait University various maintenance fees and office action responses

Why it matters: Every one of these payments flows into NGM's trust accounts and generates revenue attributed to Litman-originated clients. Meyer is CC'd on ALL of them, confirming his knowledge of the revenue stream.

Finding 7: GOLDBERG OPERATING FROM BROOKLYN — PERSONAL JURISDICTION

Bates: RL_6059, RL_6063, RL_6066, RL_6070, and throughout

Goldberg consistently identifies his location as "Brooklyn, NY" in his email signature block throughout the entire document (2022-2023).

Why it matters: Continued evidence of personal jurisdiction in New York.

Finding 8: 4PATENT.COM DOMAIN ALIASES IN ACTIVE USE

Bates: Throughout

The following @4patent.com aliases appear in these emails: - ksu@4patent.com — CC'd on all KSU correspondence - kfu@4patent.com — CC'd on KFU payment emails - ku@4patent.com — CC'd on Kuwait University correspondence - sacgc@4patent.com — CC'd on Sabah Center correspondence - clientservice@4patent.com — used for client intake (RL_6050, RL_6112)

Why it matters: Confirms NGM's systematic use of Litman's personal domain (4patent.com) for client-facing email infrastructure throughout the entire 2022-2023 period. Each use is a separate commercial exploitation of Litman's domain. Corroborates Finding #46 (50 unique @4patent.com aliases).

Finding 9: BUILDING SALE + FILE DESTRUCTION TIMELINE

Bates: RL_6099 (Oct 5, 2022), RL_6362 (Oct 7, 2022), RL_6783 (Aug 30, 2022)

Meyer announces: - Aug 30, 2022: 31,000 pounds of paper shredded — "shredding of the paper files in the building is 95% complete" - Oct 5, 2022: Firm consolidating to 4th floor only; "Josh and I (and Gary) are investigating selling the building" - Construction crews in building doing renovations on 1st and 3rd floors

Why it matters: Massive file destruction 10 months before the arbitration award. Combined with the later Freedom Bank closure and PAR suppression, this establishes a pattern of evidence destruction/concealment predating the litigation. The timing (mid-2022) is during the arbitration proceeding itself.

Finding 10: MEYER AND GOLDBERG ACTING AS JOINT DECISION-MAKERS — NO LITMAN

Bates: RL_6057, RL_6099, RL_6101, RL_6102

Meyer consistently frames decisions as "Josh and I" — never "Rich and I" or "the partners": - "Josh and I would like to wish everyone..." (RL_6057) - "Josh and I continue to evaluate our needs" (RL_6099) - "Josh and I have determined we do not need much more space" (RL_6099) - "Josh and I (and Gary) are investigating selling the building" (RL_6099) - "Josh and I have authorized Jen to provide everyone with a holiday bonus" (RL_6057)

Yet simultaneously, the very same firm is representing to all clients and the USPTO that Litman is an active attorney through his name on patents, POAs, correspondence, and website.

Why it matters: Internal firm communications confirm Litman has zero management role, while external communications continue to exploit his name and identity commercially.

Finding 11: CONFLICT CHECKS STILL INCLUDE LITMAN

Bates: RL_6229 (Dec 9, 2022)

Gregory Kang sends conflict check to all attorneys including "Richard Litman rlitman@nathlaw.com" for DeepSight potential client. Meyer responds "No conflicts."

Why it matters: In December 2022, 2.5 years after "termination," NGM still includes Litman in conflict checks — treating him as an attorney of the firm whose client relationships could create conflicts. This is internally inconsistent with any claim he was no longer associated with the firm.


NOTABLE ABSENCES

The following expected items are NOT in this 783-page production:

  1. March 2021 "CASE Act" thread — Meyer's bombshell admissions about "multi-million dollar receivable from KSU," "5-year tail of the agreement," and trust account commitment. (Already obtained via Exhibit L.)
  2. Any emails discussing Litman's compensation, the 20% formula, or W-2 payments.
  3. Any emails discussing Litman's disability or accommodation.
  4. Any emails discussing the Combination Agreement or Amendment.
  5. Any emails discussing the website or Litman's name on patents.
  6. Any emails between Meyer and Goldberg about Litman privately.
  7. Any emails discussing the arbitration proceeding.

The production appears to be heavily filtered to include only operational Meyer emails (client-facing, docketing, office admin) while excluding all substantive Meyer emails about the business relationship with Litman. This selective production pattern may itself be relevant to discovery disputes.


EVIDENTIARY VALUE SUMMARY

Category Evidentiary Impact
Litman on CC of all client emails STRONG — proves ongoing commercial use of identity
"RCL Origination Credit" entries STRONG — NGM attributes new business to Litman
Litman actively managing clients (Jan-Feb 2023) STRONG — destroys disability=death defense
20% fee calculation in operation MODERATE — confirms operational baseline
$2M+ in documented wire transfers STRONG — quantifies revenue on Litman-originated clients
4patent.com alias usage STRONG — confirms domain infrastructure exploitation
Meyer as Co-Managing Partner MODERATE — establishes his knowledge and authority
31,000 lbs paper shredded MODERATE — pre-arbitration file destruction
Building sale investigation MODERATE — asset disposition context
"Settlement discussions" label by Litman MODERATE — confirms Litman knew discussions were negotiations, not consent

BATES REFERENCE INDEX

Bates Range Content
RL_6032-6034 KSU $16,030 wire (Feb 2023)
RL_6035 Docketing correction
RL_6036-6047 KSU new patent application — Litman CC'd
RL_6048-6051 New KSU client, RCL origination credit
RL_6052-6056 Docketing daily report — KFU/KSU/Kuwait Univ dockets
RL_6057-6058 Meyer holiday email — "busier than ever"
RL_6059-6061 Litman-Goldberg settlement discussions, client management
RL_6062-6070 KSU $1,437,568 wire thread — Litman actively engaging
RL_6071-6092 KSU payment follow-up thread (Oct 2022-Feb 2023)
RL_6093-6097 KSU new patent application (duplicate)
RL_6098 Jerry working with Ellis Hooley client
RL_6099-6103 Office space consolidation, building sale
RL_6104-6105 Goldberg KSU patent status update — Litman CC'd
RL_6106-6142 KFU wire breakdowns ($143K, $90K, $331K, $42K)
RL_6143-6155 Kuwait University payments, KSU new applications
RL_6185-6230 Client work (Kevin Taybron, DeepSight conflict check)
RL_6229-6232 Conflict check — Litman included
RL_6349-6352 Meyer-authored KSU payment collection thread (Jan-Apr 2022)
RL_6362-6364 Office space/furniture follow-up
RL_6374-6380 Docketing Q&A, Sabah Center client numbers
RL_6398-6400 KSU regular meeting scheduling — Litman CC'd
RL_6782 Alarm protocol
RL_6783 Shredding — 31,000 lbs paper destroyed

Analysis covers pages 1-100 in detail plus full-document keyword survey of all 783 pages. Produced: 2026-04-15