Index of Deliverables and Read Order
To: Scott D. Woller, Esq. (Wachtel Missry LLP) — Plaintiff's counsel of record From: Mike Litman, case-research support, on behalf of Plaintiff R.C. Litman (pro se) Date: April 27, 2026 Re: Litman v. Goldberg, Index No. 524343/2025 — Counsel Directions bundle for Plaintiff's directive of 4/25/2026
Eight PDFs and one companion CSV — roughly 80 pages of analysis, exhibits, and ready-to-serve discovery papers, organized to answer Plaintiff's 4/25/2026 directive (authentication / lexicon / Track 1 practice payout / Track 2 §§ 50–51).
Live web mirror of this bundle: https://litmanintelligence.com/counsel/2026-04-27/
| # | File | Pages | What it is |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Litman_Counsel_Directions_2026-04-27.pdf | 16 | The headline memo. Plaintiff's four buckets fully addressed; new 4/27 finding; 7 decision points for counsel; 10-item PROD002 demand list. |
| 2 | Litman_AR_Expiring_Tag_Analysis_2026-04-27.pdf | 7 | The new 4/27 finding: 96 of 108 KSU dockets tagged "expired J. Goldberg" in Oct 2025 are missing from the Q4 2025 Gould Receivables-by-Client report — the third concealment channel alongside formal write-offs and trust-side sweeps. |
| 3 | Litman_AR_Expiring_Tag_Removed_Dockets_2026-04-27.csv | — | Companion data file — all 108 expired-tagged dockets with present/missing flag and AR amounts where retained. |
| 4 | Litman_AR_Report_Responsible_JBG_Finding_2026-04-27.pdf | 9 | The Feb 17, 2026 AR Report personally requested by Goldberg with SortByResponsible:true; surfaces the single casefile NGM internally attributes to Goldberg (KSU 33115.20U, $16,700) while publicly attributing it to Litman. |
| 5 | Litman_Client_Level_Writeoff_Master_2026-04-27.pdf | 8 | $336,571 in formal write-offs (116 entries, KSU-dominant); 82.7% by-dollars cross-link to Martha Long emails; the AssumeProvisionalWriteOffReal=True flag with Write-Off Journal never produced (CPLR 3122-a target). |
| 6 | Litman_Expired_Matters_Master_2026-04-27.pdf | 8 | $317,746 swept from trust on 111 entries labeled "expired J. Goldberg F[iles]" in the October 2025 Trust Transfer Journal; 110/111 signed by Valencia Gray (NGM accounting); 0 signed by Goldberg personally. |
| 7 | Litman_Trademark_Name_Use_Memo_2026-04-27.pdf | 7 | The Track 2 trademark sub-track: 245 trademark dockets, 7+ post-SOL TTAB proceedings, the TUFFKOTE smoking gun, the Nicola Pizza exemplar, the July 24, 2025 Hashtag Sports cease-and-desist (latest confirmed name use in the entire case). |
| 8 | Litman_PROD001_Substantive_Findings_2026-04-27.pdf | 12 | PROD001 (Goldberg's first rolling production, 1,317 docs / 11,757 pages, ingested 4/23/2026) — the two headline finds (RCL.xlsx 3,957-matter master list; June 2025 admissions triad + Schaefer CC) and the concealment pattern. |
| 9 | Litman_Uncle_Photos_Evidence_Memo_2026-04-27.pdf | 8 | NEW 4/27 evidence category. Two Goldberg-personally-signed KFU Patent Assignment Cover Sheets at USPTO Reels 065379/0084 (10/29/2023) and 065933/0139 (12/21/2023), both naming Litman as correspondent — separate document type from the 16 POAs. Plus direct Goldberg→Litman 3/6/2023 KSU wire email; Aaron Gould 11/14/2025 "Richard: No." refusal of Phase-1 discovery; 10/30/2025 USPTO trademark notification still routing to Litman post-litigation; NEW 7/25/2025 Kline TM-renewal client email CC'ing Litman — pushes latest-confirmed-name-use anchor by 1 day, 7 days post-alleged-elimination. |
| 10 | Litman_Uncle_Photos_Exhibit_Binder_2026-04-27.pdf | 23 | Catalogued visual binder of all 21 photographs — exhibit-numbered (EX-A1 through EX-F3), one image per page with caption + legal significance. |
| 11 | Litman_Royalty_Reconciliation_2026-04-27.pdf | 9 | NEW 4/27 financial finding. Defendant's own 6/26/2025 RL Trust Ledger Report shows $32,708,669.08 in trust receipts; $23,694,007.62 transferred to Defendant's own operating accounts; $1,220,839.73 remaining in trust. Plaintiff's lead position: the conservative $2.34M floor (20% × $23.7M-OUT-to-Operating, less $2.4M paid) — not the full $32.7M as Revenue. Defendant's reconciliation accounting reduces the base to $16,506,604.92 — $16,202,064.16 unreconciled — supporting an equitable-accounting claim independent of contract enforcement. Higher scenarios ($3.35M / $4.14M) are presented as alternative ceilings only. |
| 12 | Litman_Glossary_Updated_2026-04-27.pdf | 11 | Updated case lexicon — three new entries 4/27 ("AR never expires" rule; "deferred payment for the Practice"; Long-cascade / Kline-cascade nomenclature). |
The 4/25/2026 deliverables Scott has not yet acknowledged are still live and remain operative:
All 4/25 deliverables remain available at: https://litmanintelligence.com/counsel/2026-04-25/
The trust-receipts reconciliation — the headline financial finding. Defendant's own June 26, 2025 RL Trust Ledger Report (Soluno PCLaw business record under CPLR 4518) shows $32,708,669.08 in trust receipts on Plaintiff's originated-client matters. Defendant transferred $23,694,007.62 to its own operating accounts, leaving only $1,220,839.73 in trust. Defendant's reconciliation accounting computes Plaintiff's 20% royalty against a base of only $16,506,604.92 — $16,202,064.16 unreconciled, 49.5% of the total trust receipts. Plaintiff's lead position is the conservative $2.34M floor, anchored on the $23.7M Defendant itself transferred to its operating accounts — not the full $32.7M as Revenue. The $16.2M unreconciled gap supports a Court-ordered equitable accounting independent of the contract-enforcement claim. Higher figures ($3.35M / $4.14M shortfall) are presented as alternative ceilings the Court may consider only if Defendant fails to produce entry-by-entry backup. Full analysis in Litman Royalty Reconciliation, 4/27/2026 (in this bundle).
AR-side removal-from-tracking — the third concealment channel. NGM has at least three coordinated channels for moving Litman-attributable amounts off the books without proper accounting disclosure: (a) formal write-offs ($336,571), (b) trust-side "expired" sweeps ($317,746), and (c) AR-side disappearance from the Q4 2025 Gould Receivables-by-Client report (96 of 108 expired-tagged dockets simply missing). Same 108 KSU dockets, three coordinated bookkeeping operations, one calendar quarter (Q4 2025), no formal disclosure to Plaintiff, no journal entries produced.
Track 2 restructured into two parallel cascade pipes. Per Plaintiff 4/27: "Howard Kline sent his own emails for trademarks like Martha did for patents." The §§ 50-51 evidence now carries on two independent rails — patents (Lafave + Long, KFU exemplar) and trademarks (Kline, Nicola Pizza exemplar). Both under Defendant Goldberg's supervision; both showing Litman's name in client-facing communications post-SOL. The latest confirmed name use in the entire case — the July 24, 2025 Hashtag Sports cease-and-desist signed Litman+Kline, six days post-email-elimination — is on the trademark side.
NEW evidence category — Goldberg-personally-signed KFU Patent Assignment Cover Sheets. Surfaced from Plaintiff's photographs 4/27/2026: two USPTO public records, post-arbitration, where Defendant Goldberg himself is the submitter and signatory while the Correspondent Name field reads "RICHARD C. LITMAN NATH, GOLDBERG & MEYER." KFU Docket 33135.22U / App. 18,383,448 / Reel 065379-0084 / signed 10/29/2023; KFU Docket 33150.15U / App. 18,392,663 / Reel 065933-0139 / signed 12/21/2023. This is a separate document type from the 16 Goldberg-signed POAs already in the case record — adds a public-record channel of "Goldberg told KFU that Litman is their contact" that pairs with the verbal-channel anchor email (Bates LITMAN209485, "our attorney," 12/20/2023) and the volume-channel Long-cascade.
Three converging proofs. The case theory now rests on three independent evidentiary chains: (a) face-page election (12 vs. 449 vs. 1, post-7/21/2024) — strengthened by the two new Goldberg-signed assignments; (b) supervised-staffer cascade (769–880 dated patent uses + 1,477 dated trademark uses, within-SOL); (c) internal matter ledger (RCL.xlsx, 3,957 matters / 17 NEW post-7/21/2024 assignments, Defendant-produced). Each chain stands alone and corroborates the other two.
Per-patent name election empirically proven. Three PTOL-85B forms by the same signer in 2024: 5/28/2024 = "Richard C. Litman" / 6/12/2024 = "Joshua B. Goldberg" / 9/25/2024 = "James Lafave." Same hand, same firm, same registration number, three different names within four months. Forecloses every "system default" defense.
Damages anchor: $2,108,387 (22 mo) / $2,412,428 (24 mo) — NGM's own Aaron Gould-produced math from the monthly Payment Allocation by Client Reports. Term: "deferred payment for the Practice" / "unpaid 20% share." Banned: "back pay."
All 12 dockets are Litman-originated client matters. Every one follows the legacy Litman Law Offices PracticeMaster docket format — the matters Plaintiff brought to NGM in the 2017 transition.
Everything in this bundle is reproducible from local data + live USPTO Open Data Portal queries, plus the Defendant-produced PROD001 native-file set. The case dashboard is live at https://litmanintelligence.com/ with a separate productions index at https://litmanintelligence.com/productions.html carrying the full PROD001 corpus (1,317 PDFs, full-text searchable, native-file downloads, Bates index).
Questions or revisions: awesomefat@gmail.com
Prepared 2026-04-27 by Litman Intelligence Research Team. Attorney work product — privileged and confidential.