← litmanintelligence.com  |  ← Counsel PDFs index  |  Counsel dashboard

Martha Long Litman Name Analysis

Martha Long Email Evidence Analysis: Litman Name Use in Client-Facing Correspondence

Generated: 2026-04-15 Sources: EMAIL_METADATA_ND0001.csv (181,571 emails) + EMAIL_METADATA_ND0002.csv (95,330 emails) Legal Theory: Each email from Martha Long to a client bearing an attachment that contains Richard Litman's name constitutes a separate commercial use of his name under NY Civil Rights Law Section 51, dated when the email was SENT (not when the underlying patent issued).


Executive Summary

Martha Long sent 36,930 qualifying emails with substantive attachments (PDFs, DOCX, XLSX -- excluding image-only signature files) across 4,861 unique docket numbers referencing patent work performed under Litman's name. Of these:

Category Count
Total qualifying emails 36,930
Post-SOL (after 6/15/2020) 33,486
Post-SOL to external clients 9,073
Post-entitlement (after 6/15/2025) 533
Post-entitlement to external clients 309
Post-entitlement CC'ing Litman 17
Post-entitlement CC'ing Goldberg 39
Post-email-elimination (7/18/2025) CC'ing Litman 9
Latest email date September 30, 2025

The 533 post-entitlement emails are the most legally significant: they occurred after the 5-year entitlement period expired on 6/15/2025, meaning there is zero contractual cover for any name use in this period. The 9 emails CC'ing Litman after 7/18/2025 (the date Goldberg claims email accounts were "eliminated") prove the accounts remained active and were used to route client correspondence -- stacking with Finding #106 (8,024 emails to "eliminated" accounts).


Why These Emails Are Separate Section 51 Uses

Each Martha Long email carrying a substantive attachment (filing receipt, invoice, patent search report, office action response, etc.) constitutes an independent commercial use because:

  1. The attachments bear Litman's name -- USPTO Filing Receipts list "37833 / Richard C. Litman / Nath, Goldberg & Meyer" in the correspondence block. Invoices reference the firm. Cover letters reference Litman as attorney of record.

  2. The date of use is the email send date -- not the patent issue date. This means each email is independently dated as a separate act.

  3. Client-facing distribution = commercial purpose -- These emails went to Middle Eastern university IP offices (KSU, KU, UAEU, KFU, KISR, SACGC, etc.) who retained NGM specifically because of Litman's name and reputation (per Findings #24, #25, #32, #56, #65).

  4. Sent via Litman-domain aliases -- 25,867 emails CC'd @4patent.com client aliases (ksu@, ku@, etc.) -- each routed through NGM's M365 tenant on Litman's personal domain (Finding #43).


Volume by Year

Year Total Client-Facing
2019 1,556 1,474
2020 3,565 3,291
2021 580 534
2022 494 38
2023 13,238 1,088
2024 12,605 3,015
2025 4,892 2,850

Note: The 2021-2022 dip correlates with the arbitration period. The massive 2023-2024 surge (25,843 emails) represents Goldberg's post-arbitration ramp-up of the client-facing practice using Litman's name -- while simultaneously claiming the agreement had "terminated."


Attachment Document Types (All Qualifying Emails)

Document Type Count
Invoice 13,576
Application/Draft 8,478
Patent Search 4,924
Office Action 3,886
Assignment/CDA 2,708
Notice of Allowance 2,211
Filing Receipt 1,684
Amendment 1,430
Issue Fee 1,185
Power of Attorney 1,152
Petition 112
Other Document 34,636

Each invoice, filing receipt, NOA, and amendment response bears the firm name "Nath, Goldberg & Meyer" and/or references CN-37833 (which listed "Richard C. Litman" until May 1, 2025). The 1,152 Power of Attorney attachments are particularly significant -- 16 POAs bear Goldberg's personal signature (Finding #1).


Top Client Institutions (Post-SOL, Client-Facing)

Institution Emails
King Saud University (KSU) 4,052
Kuwait University (KU) 854
United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) 480
Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) 143
Qatar Foundation (QF) 140
Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) 108
King Faisal University (KFU) 78
Arabian Gulf University (AGU) 60
Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI) 57
Jouf University 23

KSU alone accounts for 4,052 post-SOL client-facing emails -- each a separate Section 51 use.


POST-ENTITLEMENT EMAILS (After 6/15/2025) -- ZERO CONTRACTUAL COVER

Monthly Breakdown

Month Count
June 2025 359
July 2025 165
September 2025 9

167 unique docket numbers appear in post-entitlement emails spanning at least 8 client institutions.

Post-Entitlement Client Recipients (External)

Recipient Emails
iptl@ksu.edu.sa (KSU IP Office) 185
talbahkali@ksu.edu.sa 160
hhaly@ksu.edu.sa 160
ovpr.patent@ku.edu.kw (KU Patent Office) 73
shaikha.alsanea@ku.edu.kw 67
dr.aldousari@ku.edu.kw 65
y.alshatti@sacgc.org (SACGC) 21
ip@uaeu.ac.ae (UAEU) 12
ahaji@kisr.edu.kw (KISR) 10
info@kakuk.com 8
thuraya3@squ.edu.om (SQU) 6

Top Post-Entitlement Docket Numbers

Docket Count Client
33044.98S 12 Kuwait University
33044.89S 9 Kuwait University
33044.91U 8 Kuwait University
33190.19U 8 King Faisal University
33044.71U 8 Kuwait University
33060.79U 7 Sabah Al-Ahmad Center
33044.62U 7 Kuwait University
33092.16U 7 King Saud University
33115.84U 7 King Saud University
33044.94S 7 Kuwait University

CRITICAL SECTION: Post-Email-Elimination Emails CC'ing Litman (After 7/18/2025)

Nine emails from Martha Long were sent to KSU clients CC'ing Richard Litman at rlitman@nathlaw.com AFTER Goldberg claims the email account was "eliminated" on July 18, 2025. All nine also CC'd Joshua Goldberg. These are devastating because they prove:

  1. The email account was NOT eliminated -- it was receiving client correspondence
  2. Goldberg was CC'd on these same emails, so he KNEW Litman's name was still being used
  3. These are the most temporally remote uses -- September 24 and September 30, 2025
Date Bates Subject Docket
2025-09-24 07:23:29 C2051472_ND0000221460 New Patent Search -- Docket 33118.12S -- Esthetic Orthodontic Bracket Reinforced with Enclosing Metal Base 33118.12S
2025-09-24 07:24:47 C2051472_ND0000221461 New Patent Search -- Docket 33118.13S -- Interactive Motor Coordination Training System 33118.13S
2025-09-24 07:25:30 C2051472_ND0000221462 New Patent Search -- Docket 33118.14S -- Ultrasonic Medical Diagnostic Apparatus for Hemorrhage 33118.14S
2025-09-24 10:03:56 C2051472_ND0000221475 RE: The Stamped Invoices (multiple)
2025-09-30 07:19:14 C2051472_ND0000223853 RE: Our Ref.: 1345 - Collapsible and Expandable Atrial Retractor for Mitral Valve Exposure --
2025-09-30 07:26:18 C2051472_ND0000223854 RE: New Patent Search -- Docket 33115.64S -- STAMP (Surgical Tool for Accurate Membrane Punching) 33115.64S
2025-09-30 07:29:43 C2051472_ND0000223855 New Patent Search -- Docket 33118.16S -- Centrifugal Expansion Polymeric Heart Valve (CEPV) 33118.16S
2025-09-30 07:31:13 C2051472_ND0000223856 New Patent Search -- Docket 33118.17S -- Portable Electromagnetic Lifting and Transport Device 33118.17S
2025-09-30 10:16:01 C2051472_ND0000223859 RE: Official Certified Copies --

All nine sent to KSU (iptl@ksu.edu.sa), CC: ksu@4patent.com + jgoldberg@nathlaw.com + rlitman@nathlaw.com.

Goldberg was on every single one. He saw Litman's name being used and did nothing.


Sample Attachment Filenames

These attachment filenames demonstrate the document types being sent under the firm name:


Cross-References to Existing Findings

Finding Connection
#1 (16 POA signatures) 1,152 POA attachments in Martha's emails -- the distribution channel for Goldberg-signed POAs
#13 (Jan 2025 switchover) Martha's emails continue using Litman's name on filing receipts and correspondence even after Goldberg replaced him on patent front pages
#23 (email elimination) 9 post-7/18 emails CC to rlitman@nathlaw.com prove the account was active
#46 (4patent.com aliases) 25,867 emails via @4patent.com client aliases -- Martha used Litman's domain infrastructure daily
#107 (CN-37833 removal) Filing receipts attached to Martha's emails bore "Richard C. Litman" in the CN-37833 block until May 1, 2025
#106 (8,024 post-elimination emails) Martha's 9 post-7/18 emails are a subset of the broader 8,024 pattern
#70 (July 24, 2025 latest use) Martha's emails extend active Litman-name client correspondence through September 30, 2025

Significance for Section 51 Damages

Under the deck-of-cards theory, Martha Long's emails are the largest single category of independently-dated commercial uses of Litman's name:

Combined with the 206 USPTO outgoing documents, 905 patent front pages, 245 trademark dockets, and website evidence, the Martha Long email corpus establishes that Litman's name was used commercially thousands of times per year through the firm's primary client-facing employee.


Data File

Full CSV with all 36,930 emails: output/MARTHA_LONG_LITMAN_NAME_EMAILS.csv

Columns: Date, Bates, Source, From, To, CC, Subject, Docket, Attachments, CC_Litman, To_Client, To_Goldberg, Client_Alias, Litman_In_Attach, Post_Entitlement, Has_Docket