Communication Network
276,899 Emails — Who Talked to Whom
Litman (Name Used)
Goldberg (Defendant)
Martha Long (Conduit)
Kline (Trademark)
Lafave (PTOL-85B)
Clients
Other Staff
Five Years of Name Use — Day by Day
Calendar heatmap of evidence activity, Jan 2020 – Dec 2025
None
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Defendant Act
Key Event
What He Says vs. What We Prove
Every denial, systematically demolished
Case Strength Assessment
AI-analyzed confidence across all elements
Overall Case Strength
Based on 276,899 emails analyzed, 905 patents reviewed,
12 formal admissions identified, and zero consent documents produced,
the evidence supports all three elements of NY Civil Rights Law § 51 with high confidence.
The defendant's own verified Answer concedes the use element. 16 personal POA signatures
establish direct causation. Post-arbitration conduct demonstrates willfulness.
Evidence DNA — The Pattern Repeats
Four patents, one identical mechanism
POA Filed (Goldberg)
Filing Receipt (Litman)
Office Actions
Notice of Allowance
PTOL-85B (Lafave)
Patent Issued