Litman Intelligence — Settlement Conference Exhibit

Litman v. Goldberg — Damages Valuation Stack

Tiered Analysis as of April 7, 2026  ·  Index No. 524343/2025  ·  NY Sup. Ct., Kings County

Seven-Tier Valuation

$0
$10M
$20M
$30M
$40M
$50M
$60M
$70M
$80M
1HARD FLOOR
$2.27M
$1.98M KFU 20% share authenticated against Defendant's own ledger + $49K May–Jun 2025 + $246K Q4 2025. Mathematically locked.
2DOCUMENTED SHORTFALL
$5.85M – $7.7M
$7.7M
Trust-account variance across produced ledgers; gap between $32.7M trust flow and $16.5M workup; KFU/KSU revenue zeroed out.
3DISCOVERY YIELD
+$1.0M – $2.5M
$10.2M cumulative
Projected from Soluno export, bank subpoenas, and concealed Aug–Sep 2025 monthly reports (240-day suppression pattern).
4§ 51 PER-PUBLICATION
$5M – $30M
$30M
905 patents × Line 74 + 17,000+ outgoing USPTO documents + 205,597 client emails. Each a separate § 51 commercial use.
5WILLFULNESS / PUNITIVE
1.5× – 5× multiplier
5× compensatory ceiling
16 POAs personally signed post-arbitration; active concealment of 11 of 33 monthly reports; spoliation of email accounts July 18, 2025.
6REPUTATION DAMAGE
1.0× – 2.0× multiplier
2× compensatory
Bennington, Albannai, Dvorkin — three clients on record drawn "solely because of Richard Litman." Personal-goodwill loss is provable.
7MSJ POINT III FULL DEMAND
$6.1M – $77.9M
$6.1M ─────────────────── Composite range ─────────────────── $77.9M
Composite range from briefed MSJ Point III. Settlement targets overlaid: white = floor/target, gold = $22M recommended demand.
Settlement floor / target ($9M – $14M) Recommended demand ($22M)

Settlement Matrix

PositionAmountNotes
Walk-Away$9,000,000Below this, trial yields a higher expected value than settlement.
Floor$9,000,000Hard Floor + Documented Shortfall midpoint; no concession on willfulness.
Target$12,000,000 – $14,000,000Compensatory + modest punitive; clears all known accounting gaps.
Recommended Opening Demand$22,000,000Anchored to Tier 4 midpoint × willfulness factor; leaves room to negotiate to Target.
Trial Value (Expected)$11,000,000 – $45,000,000Probability-weighted across MSJ Point III range with punitive overlay.

Key Facts Driving Valuation

$1.98M KFU 20% share authenticated to within 1.6% against Defendant's own ledger — the floor is not estimated, it is reconciled.
Active concealment of 11 of 33 monthly reports proven, not inferred — the suppression pattern is documentary.
9 of 12 major institutional clients appear in double-overlay (alias renaming + client renumbering) — systemic, not incidental.
240-day concealment of the July 2025 report; the same delay would put the August 2025 report already 209 days overdue as of today.